LUCIFER'SLUGGAGE
Suitcase Nukes In America

Written by Stephen Quayle



Copyright © 2005 by Stephen Quayle

All rights reserved. Except for use in a review, no portion of this book may be reproduced in any form without the express written permission of the publisher.

Neither the author nor the publisher assumes any responsibility for the use or misuse of information contained in this book.


The First Nukes

In August 1945 the United States unleashed a new weapon of mass destruction against the Japanese first at Hiroshima and a few days later, at Nagasaki. These attacks brought the close to World War II and most likely saved millions of Japanese and American lives by avoiding a bloody invasion of Japan that would undoubtedly only ended after many fights to the death in hand-to-hand combat.

These new “atomic bombs” were whole orders of magnitude beyond any conventional explosives that had been seen up to that time in warfare. The weapons killed by the sheer magnitude of their blasts. But they also unleashed a heat pulse that created firestorms. And later it was discovered that they also created deadly nuclear fallout as well.

Although the US held the only nuclear weapons for a time, Soviet spies had soon sent the know-how to Russia. By 1949, the Soviet Union had assembled this knowledge into a workable bomb which it exploded to demonstrate to the world that it, too, held the secrets to devastating animation. As the Soviet Union started invading its neighbors, it soon was demonstrating that it had taken up where the Nazis had only recently left off. Soon both the East and the West had embarked upon an arms races that threatened to unleash a hail of nuclear bombs and missile warheads across the face of the planet.

As the hostilities increased, it also became apparent that the strategic bombing of World War II, in which civilian populations as well as industrial centers were targets, would likely continue with deadly efficiency should a nuclear war break out. In order to preserve life as well as industrial capacity, both nations (as well as those around them) were soon developing civil defense procedures to minimize losses.

Unfortunately the US civil defense program ground to an abrupt halt under President Johnson when Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara devised the doctrine of Mutual Assured Destruction (with the apt acronym "MAD"). According to this doctrine, since the nuclear damage done to both sides of a nuclear exchange would be so serious, neither side could afford to launch the first attack.

With that assumption in hand, the US federal government discontinued most of its civil defense programs, instead relegating most preparations to dealing with hurricanes, earthquakes, and other natural disasters, while leaving the American public as sitting ducks to any nuclear attack that might have occurred. (Interestingly, this discontinuation of protection for the American public was done very quietly so that for decades afterward, many US citizens thought that the fallout shelter signs - left in place from the real civil defense programs of the 1950s and 1960s - were still stocked with supplies. In fact most either had out-dated supplies or none at all. Equally fascinating is that the US congress and various presidential successors to Nixon continued to build lavish fallout shelters for themselves and stock them with supplies, all paid for by US taxpayers who remained unprotected unless they spent their own money for a private shelter.)

The Russians, Chinese, and others didn't buy into this doctrine, however, and continued to develop complex fallout and blast shelters, spread out their industries and military complexes so they would be hard to attack, and trained their populations to survive nuclear strikes. By the late 1970s, President Jimmy Carter realized that MAD was quickly becoming a one-sided affair where the Russians (or Chinese) might be able to attack, destroy most of the US's cities, industries, and military complexes, and then survive any counter attack by the US. All of which would leave the congressmen and president, sitting in their expensive shelters, with no country to lead.

In 1979, President Jimmy Carter created the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to deal with the problem, his administration also coming up with a bizarre plan to completely evacuate US cities, leaving behind only essential personnel who would (the theory went) continue to run key industries and keep the cities spic and span for when the population returned.

Such a plan would never have worked. Just getting a huge population out of town before missiles arrived (less than 20 minutes if launched from a Soviet submarine off the US coast) was impossible; having them leave early might precipitate an attack since the Russians could see we were preparing for war.

Worse, there were never any plans as to how to house and feed those who might have managed to get out. Various cities were told that their populations would go to this or that small town on their outskirts, but the officials in those areas got no funding nor were they ever given any insight as to what they should do when the thousands or even millions of people arrived at their outskirts, wanting somewhere to stay, water to drink, and food to eat.

Providentially for Americans, neither McNamara's MAD scheme nor Carter's equally mad scheme were ever put to the test. President Ronald Reagan instead took office and immediately launched a “Star Wars” defense plan that would make Soviet missiles obsolete while the new President also took additional steps that would eventually bankrupt the Soviet economy as they built more and more weapons in the hope of being able to overpower the new defensive shield.

Eventually the US President would stand in Germany and say, “Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this Wall,” sounding the death knell for the Cold War as well as the Berlin Wall that had been erected to imprison East Germans in their “workers' paradise.” When the Berlin Wall fell, it signaled that the Achilles' heel of the Communist system had been wounded: It's lack of competition and lack of a system that rewarded innovation had bankrupted both its economy as well as its creativity.

Hard on the heels of this public demonstration of weakness in the Soviet Empire came the revelation from the CIA and other quarters that the Soviet weapons were not as reliable as had once been thought. This truth had been hinted in failed attempts by overwhelming numbers of Arab nations, armed with Soviet military equipment, to invade Israel. Despite the fact that the Israelis were vastly outnumbered, each time they were able to beat back the invasions. Each time it appeared that the US-based weapons systems used by the Israelis had bested that of the Russians by a wide margin.

This weakness of Soviet weaponry became painfully apparent with the Gulf War under President George Bush. This time American troops, armed with new high-tech Abrams tanks and Bradley APCs, as well as with a wealth of smart bombs and guided weapons launched both from the ground as well as from the air, proved that there was no contest between the East and West when it came to weapons designs.

Not only were US casualties few and far between, many Iraq soldiers died without ever knowing what had hit them. And Russian-made anti-aircraft weapons, charged with protecting the skies over Baghdad, were ludicrously incapable of bringing down American planes.

The fall of the Berlin Wall had been the death rattle; the Gulf War drove the stake through the heart of communism. And to the dismay of fellow travelers and socialists around the world, capitalism had broken the back of the Soviet system, thanks in large part to Ronald Reagan, who had the insight to use what America did best to bring about the demise of the brutal Russian government, as well as put such governments to rout in China, North Korea, and elsewhere.

Regrettably, even as the Soviet Empire was in its death throws, a new backward looking system was being devised to replace it. Like communism, this one loathed our free society, Christian principles, and the work ethic. This new one was based on a direct reading and belief in the teachings of the Koran. And it hoped to use these deadly teachings to destroy our Christian nation and our way of life, killing and enslaving us in the process.

Worse, some of the very same nuclear weapons that were created in the Soviet Union for use against America may be finding their way into our new enemy's hands, sold to them through the black market that has grown in what remains of the Russian empire.

Some of these weapons are seriously dangerous.

For example weapons expert Christoph Bluth, who serves as Professor at the Graduate School of European and International Studies at the University of Reading, wrote in 1997,
10

There is no adequate accounting for all the warheads, many of which were withdrawn under emergency conditions and dumped at the sites.

There are persistent reports of missing warheads, such as 23 warheads that disappeared from a depot at Komsomolsk-na-Amure in March 1992 and 12 warheads based in East Germany that could not be accounted for prior to the withdrawal of all warheads from Eastern Europe.

A few months later, US Congressman Fortney Pete Stark would also note,11

The breakup of the Soviet Union left an undetermined amount of nuclear materials scattered throughout the former Soviet territories. Large quantities of nuclear weapons, weapons materials, and technology in the former Soviet Union are all potential proliferation problems.

There are terrifying reports that nuclear materials have been illegally stolen and transferred from Russia to rogue states. The sluggish economic conditions in Russia have provoked Russian nuclear and missile experts in accepting employment offers in rogue nations.

A few weeks later Dr. Thomas Cochran, director of the Nuclear Program of the Natural Resources Defense Council and former Chairman of the International Task Force Appointed by the Moscow Nuclear Safety Summit would also sound the alarm,12

Everyone should be worried about it because once these materials are stolen and diverted out of Russia, they can be manufactured into nuclear weapons anywhere-in the Middle East, in the Far East, in the United States, and anyone can then become a target, a terrorist target, or a target by a rogue state.

The scenario that concerns me the most is not the Unabomber and his little house up in the mountains, making an atomic bomb. But it's that someone would divert this material, sell it to an Iran, an Iraq, or Libya, North Korea, and the weapon would be manufactured by one of these rogue states, and then could be transported by terrorist groups.

While some efforts were made to secure Russian nuclear weapons and materials, for the most part these warnings came too late, or went all but unheeded. As will be detailed in the following chapters, nuclear materials continue to enter the black market not just from Russia, and rogue states like North Korea and Iran are enjoying the benefits of these smuggled materials to create their own nuclear weapons programs.

Furthermore, other nations have started their own smuggling operations, often selling to anyone with cash, and/or a hatred of America. In mid-2004, the International Institute for Strategic Studies warned that there was growing data showing that al-Qaeda and other terrorists were in the US in large numbers, and that they were preparing an attack that would very likely involve chemical, biological, or radiological materials.
13

The International Institute for Strategic Studies also noted that more than just a few individuals might be involved, with the worldwide number of al-Qaeda members being somewhere around 18,000 individuals. And the intelligence indicated that terrorists were most likely planning to use a chemical, biological or radiological weapon.14

That's 18,000 terrorists, anyone of which could be carrying a nuclear device on US soil as you read this.

The bottom line here is that today we face an enemy that works through terrorism, with its targets of choice being unsuspecting civilians. And this enemy has gained access to a variety of nuclear materials. Now we are simply waiting for the other shoe to drop, for the use of a nuclear weapon by our terrorist foes.

As terrorism expert Matthew Bunn, at Harvard's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, recently put it,
15

As I'm very surprised that a radiological device hasn't gone off.... why no Al Qaeda attacks since Sept. 11 in the US?

A nuclear attack by terrorists on US soil is overdue. It is not a matter of “if” but rather “when.”

That's the bad news.

The good news is that there is much you can do to avoid this threat to you and your loved ones, and greatly improve your chances of surviving an attack should you have the misfortune to be in the area when such an attack occurs.

This manual will give you this information, showing you what the threats are and how to protect your loved ones from the growing dangers.



1 Curt Weldon, Committee on National Security, Military Research and Development Subcommittee, Washington, DC, Wednesday, October 1-2, 1997.
2 Anthony Kimmery, “High Alert - U.S. Threatened With Nukes,” Insight on the News, Nov. 2, 2001.
3 Douglas Frantz, “Threat of 'Dirty Bomb' Growing, Officials Say,” Los Angeles Times, May 9, 2004.
4 Ibid.
5 Ibid.
6 Ibid.
7 Lyric Wallwork Winik, “New Fears About Old Arms,” Parade, May 16, 2004.
8 Ibid.
9 Douglas Frantz, “Threat of 'Dirty Bomb' Growing, Officials Say,” Los Angeles Times, May 9, 2004.
10 Christoph Bluth, Jane's Intelligence Review, December 1, 1997, p. 548.
11 Fortney Pete Stark, Congressional Record, March 4, 1998, p. E295.
12 Frontline - Loose Nukes: Investigating the Threat of Nuclear Smuggling, April 20, 1998.
13 Paul Tighe, “US Plans Anti-Terror Steps After Attack Warning,” Bloomberg.com, May 26, 2004.
14 Ibid.
15 Douglas Frantz, “Threat of 'Dirty Bomb' Growing, Officials Say,” Los Angeles Times, May 9, 2004.


Coming Jan. 2005!



Home